Versus
Hiring Index vs JSearch
The cheap default on the marketplace. Here is where each of us is the better answer, with their published numbers as of 27–28 August 2026.
Their side
What JSearch publishes
| Measure | Their claim |
|---|---|
| Pricing | Free 200/mo · $25 for 10k · $75 for 50k · $150 for 200k · $0.005 pay-as-you-go |
| Limit to know | Their own documentation states salary fields are only populated when the employer includes salary data — there is no normalisation |
Read from RapidAPI · OpenWeb Ninja on 27–28 August 2026. These are their statements about their own product; we have not independently verified them.
Honest
Where JSearch is stronger
- Cheapest way to get job rows on the marketplace, by a distance.
- Zero setup if you are already on RapidAPI.
Our side
Where Hiring Index is stronger
- Salary is normalised to a currency and period, so a median actually means something.
- Aggregates, deduplication and posting age are included rather than absent.
Decision
Which to pick
Pick JSearch if…
You need raw rows as cheaply as possible and will do your own cleaning.
Pick Hiring Index if…
You would rather not write the cleaning layer.
Access
Try it before you decide
Get started free on RapidAPI
Free tier, no card. Billing and keys are handled by RapidAPI.
More
Other comparisons
One thing worth knowing about this market: Proxycurl, a well-known provider of this kind of data,
shut down on 4 July 2025 after a lawsuit from LinkedIn. Where a vendor gets its postings from
matters as much as how many it has. We read company career systems and applicant tracking
systems, and we say so on the about page.