Versus
Hiring Index vs Fantastic.jobs
Freshness-first ATS feed with separate expired and modified streams. Here is where each of us is the better answer, with their published numbers as of 27–28 August 2026.
Their side
What Fantastic.jobs publishes
| Measure | Their claim |
|---|---|
| Freshness claimed | Hourly refresh; 95% of new postings within 3 hours |
| Pricing | Starter $95 for 20k, up to Scale $750 for 500k; overage $0.0015–0.0025 |
| Notable | Dedicated expired and modified endpoints |
| Coverage gap | No CIS coverage |
Read from fantastic.jobs on 27–28 August 2026. These are their statements about their own product; we have not independently verified them.
Honest
Where Fantastic.jobs is stronger
- The strongest freshness claim in this comparison, and separate change streams are genuinely useful.
- Overage pricing is the cheapest per record of anyone here.
Our side
Where Hiring Index is stronger
- Age is reported as a distribution, not only as a change event — you can see the shape of a market, not just what moved.
- Aggregates and an MCP server come with the same key.
Decision
Which to pick
Pick Fantastic.jobs if…
You are syncing a feed and need change events within the hour.
Pick Hiring Index if…
You are answering questions about a market rather than syncing a mirror of it.
Access
Try it before you decide
Get started free on RapidAPI
Free tier, no card. Billing and keys are handled by RapidAPI.
More
Other comparisons
One thing worth knowing about this market: Proxycurl, a well-known provider of this kind of data,
shut down on 4 July 2025 after a lawsuit from LinkedIn. Where a vendor gets its postings from
matters as much as how many it has. We read company career systems and applicant tracking
systems, and we say so on the about page.