Versus

Hiring Index vs Fantastic.jobs

Freshness-first ATS feed with separate expired and modified streams. Here is where each of us is the better answer, with their published numbers as of 27–28 August 2026.

Their side

What Fantastic.jobs publishes

MeasureTheir claim
Freshness claimedHourly refresh; 95% of new postings within 3 hours
PricingStarter $95 for 20k, up to Scale $750 for 500k; overage $0.0015–0.0025
NotableDedicated expired and modified endpoints
Coverage gapNo CIS coverage

Read from fantastic.jobs on 27–28 August 2026. These are their statements about their own product; we have not independently verified them.

Honest

Where Fantastic.jobs is stronger

  • The strongest freshness claim in this comparison, and separate change streams are genuinely useful.
  • Overage pricing is the cheapest per record of anyone here.
Our side

Where Hiring Index is stronger

  • Age is reported as a distribution, not only as a change event — you can see the shape of a market, not just what moved.
  • Aggregates and an MCP server come with the same key.
Decision

Which to pick

Pick Fantastic.jobs if…

You are syncing a feed and need change events within the hour.

Pick Hiring Index if…

You are answering questions about a market rather than syncing a mirror of it.

Access

Try it before you decide

Get started free on RapidAPI

Free tier, no card. Billing and keys are handled by RapidAPI.

Open on RapidAPI →
More

Other comparisons

One thing worth knowing about this market: Proxycurl, a well-known provider of this kind of data, shut down on 4 July 2025 after a lawsuit from LinkedIn. Where a vendor gets its postings from matters as much as how many it has. We read company career systems and applicant tracking systems, and we say so on the about page.