Versus
Hiring Index vs Coresignal
A large historical archive of postings, priced per record. Here is where each of us is the better answer, with their published numbers as of 27–28 August 2026.
Their side
What Coresignal publishes
| Measure | Their claim |
|---|---|
| Coverage claimed | 468M+ postings archived since 2020 |
| Pricing | From $49/mo; $0.196 down to $0.005 per record at volume |
| Notable | Remote MCP server; bulk collect up to 10,000 records per request |
| Limit to know | Search credits and collect credits are billed separately; the base tier is single-source and not deduplicated |
Read from coresignal.com on 27–28 August 2026. These are their statements about their own product; we have not independently verified them.
Honest
Where Coresignal is stronger
- Depth of history nobody else in this comparison matches.
- Per-record pricing gets very cheap at volume.
Our side
Where Hiring Index is stronger
- One credit type, and deduplication is not a paid upgrade.
- Aggregates come back computed rather than as records you have to reduce yourself.
Decision
Which to pick
Pick Coresignal if…
You need years of history for a research or alternative-data project.
Pick Hiring Index if…
You need what is open now, and how long it has been open.
Access
Try it before you decide
Get started free on RapidAPI
Free tier, no card. Billing and keys are handled by RapidAPI.
More
Other comparisons
One thing worth knowing about this market: Proxycurl, a well-known provider of this kind of data,
shut down on 4 July 2025 after a lawsuit from LinkedIn. Where a vendor gets its postings from
matters as much as how many it has. We read company career systems and applicant tracking
systems, and we say so on the about page.