Versus

Hiring Index vs Coresignal

A large historical archive of postings, priced per record. Here is where each of us is the better answer, with their published numbers as of 27–28 August 2026.

Their side

What Coresignal publishes

MeasureTheir claim
Coverage claimed468M+ postings archived since 2020
PricingFrom $49/mo; $0.196 down to $0.005 per record at volume
NotableRemote MCP server; bulk collect up to 10,000 records per request
Limit to knowSearch credits and collect credits are billed separately; the base tier is single-source and not deduplicated

Read from coresignal.com on 27–28 August 2026. These are their statements about their own product; we have not independently verified them.

Honest

Where Coresignal is stronger

  • Depth of history nobody else in this comparison matches.
  • Per-record pricing gets very cheap at volume.
Our side

Where Hiring Index is stronger

  • One credit type, and deduplication is not a paid upgrade.
  • Aggregates come back computed rather than as records you have to reduce yourself.
Decision

Which to pick

Pick Coresignal if…

You need years of history for a research or alternative-data project.

Pick Hiring Index if…

You need what is open now, and how long it has been open.

Access

Try it before you decide

Get started free on RapidAPI

Free tier, no card. Billing and keys are handled by RapidAPI.

Open on RapidAPI →
More

Other comparisons

One thing worth knowing about this market: Proxycurl, a well-known provider of this kind of data, shut down on 4 July 2025 after a lawsuit from LinkedIn. Where a vendor gets its postings from matters as much as how many it has. We read company career systems and applicant tracking systems, and we say so on the about page.