Side by side
Engineering Manager vs Technical Product Manager
Engineering Manager pays more: a median of $172,000 against $124,500. There is 2.4× more demand for Technical Product Manager. Engineering Manager is the more remote-friendly of the two, by 6.1%. Listings for Technical Product Manager move faster — median age 35 days against 68.
Comparison
Side by side
| Measure | Engineering Manager | Technical Product Manager | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Open postings | 10,464 | 25,497 | -15,033 |
| Posted this week | 684 | 1,946 | |
| Median salary | $172,000 | $124,500 | +$47.5k |
| 25th percentile | $136k | $98.5k | |
| 75th percentile | $214k | $155k | |
| Salary disclosed | 8.1% | 5.6% | |
| Remote share | 12.7% | 6.6% | +6.1pp |
| Median age of posting | 68d | 35d | |
| Open over 60 days | 43.4% | 39.7% | |
| Visa sponsorship | 20.8% | 21.2% |
Pay
Pay distribution
Engineering Manager
$77k$298k
Technical Product Manager
$56k$215k
Freshness
How old the listings are
Engineering Manager
just posted68d median90d+
Technical Product Manager
just posted35d median90d+
Demand
What each side asks for
Engineering Manager — technologies
Technical Product Manager — technologies
Engineering Manager — employers
Technical Product Manager — employers
More comparisons
Other Product & Delivery comparisons
Engineering Manager vs Product ManagerEngineering Manager vs Program ManagerEngineering Manager vs Project ManagerEngineering Manager vs Scrum MasterProduct Manager vs Program ManagerProduct Manager vs Project ManagerProduct Manager vs Scrum MasterProduct Manager vs Technical Product ManagerProgram Manager vs Project ManagerProgram Manager vs Scrum MasterProgram Manager vs Technical Product ManagerProject Manager vs Scrum MasterProject Manager vs Technical Product ManagerScrum Master vs Technical Product Manager
Both sides are counted the same way on the same day, so the gap is comparable even where the
absolute numbers move. Salary figures use only postings that publish a range — the disclosure
rate is in the table because a median over 20% of a cohort is a weaker number than one over 70%.