Side by side
Content Marketing Manager vs Growth Marketing Manager
Pay is effectively the same — the medians sit within 2.7% apart. There is 2.4× more demand for Content Marketing Manager. Listings for Growth Marketing Manager move faster — median age 39 days against 95.
Comparison
Side by side
| Measure | Content Marketing Manager | Growth Marketing Manager | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Open postings | 25,358 | 10,476 | +14,882 |
| Posted this week | 1,906 | 668 | |
| Median salary | $91,000 | $93,500 | $-2.5k |
| 25th percentile | $72k | $74k | |
| 75th percentile | $113k | $116k | |
| Salary disclosed | 2.7% | 4.3% | |
| Remote share | 7.0% | 3.7% | +3.3pp |
| Median age of posting | 95d | 39d | |
| Open over 60 days | 34.6% | 32.6% | |
| Visa sponsorship | 12.4% | 16.6% |
Pay
Pay distribution
Content Marketing Manager
$41k$157k
Growth Marketing Manager
$42k$162k
Freshness
How old the listings are
Content Marketing Manager
just posted95d median90d+
Growth Marketing Manager
just posted39d median90d+
Demand
What each side asks for
Content Marketing Manager — technologies
Growth Marketing Manager — technologies
Content Marketing Manager — employers
Growth Marketing Manager — employers
More comparisons
Other Marketing comparisons
Brand Manager vs Content Marketing ManagerBrand Manager vs Growth Marketing ManagerBrand Manager vs Marketing ManagerBrand Manager vs SEO SpecialistBrand Manager vs Social Media ManagerContent Marketing Manager vs Marketing ManagerContent Marketing Manager vs SEO SpecialistContent Marketing Manager vs Social Media ManagerGrowth Marketing Manager vs Marketing ManagerGrowth Marketing Manager vs SEO SpecialistGrowth Marketing Manager vs Social Media ManagerMarketing Manager vs SEO SpecialistMarketing Manager vs Social Media ManagerSEO Specialist vs Social Media Manager
Both sides are counted the same way on the same day, so the gap is comparable even where the
absolute numbers move. Salary figures use only postings that publish a range — the disclosure
rate is in the table because a median over 20% of a cohort is a weaker number than one over 70%.