Side by side
Delhi vs Mumbai
Delhi pays more: a median of €88,500 against €81,000. There is 1.4× more demand for Delhi.
Comparison
Side by side
| Measure | Delhi | Mumbai | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Open postings | 52,152 | 37,087 | +15,065 |
| Posted this week | 2,430 | 1,302 | |
| Median salary | €88,500 | €81,000 | +€7.5k |
| 25th percentile | €70k | €64k | |
| 75th percentile | €110k | €101k | |
| Salary disclosed | 6.5% | 3.7% | |
| Remote share | 9.6% | 11.0% | -1.4pp |
| Median age of posting | 48d | 44d | |
| Open over 60 days | 51.3% | 34.0% | |
| Visa sponsorship | 5.0% | 13.9% |
Pay
Pay distribution
Delhi
€40k€153k
Mumbai
€36k€140k
Freshness
How old the listings are
Delhi
just posted48d median90d+
Mumbai
just posted44d median90d+
Demand
What each side asks for
Delhi — technologies
Mumbai — technologies
Delhi — employers
Mumbai — employers
More comparisons
Other India city comparisons
Ahmedabad vs BengaluruAhmedabad vs ChennaiAhmedabad vs DelhiAhmedabad vs GurgaonAhmedabad vs HyderabadAhmedabad vs IndoreAhmedabad vs KolkataAhmedabad vs MumbaiAhmedabad vs NoidaAhmedabad vs PuneBengaluru vs ChennaiBengaluru vs DelhiBengaluru vs GurgaonBengaluru vs HyderabadBengaluru vs IndoreBengaluru vs KolkataBengaluru vs MumbaiBengaluru vs NoidaBengaluru vs PuneChennai vs DelhiChennai vs GurgaonChennai vs HyderabadChennai vs IndoreChennai vs KolkataChennai vs MumbaiChennai vs NoidaChennai vs PuneDelhi vs GurgaonDelhi vs HyderabadDelhi vs IndoreDelhi vs KolkataDelhi vs NoidaDelhi vs PuneGurgaon vs HyderabadGurgaon vs IndoreGurgaon vs KolkataGurgaon vs MumbaiGurgaon vs NoidaGurgaon vs PuneHyderabad vs IndoreHyderabad vs KolkataHyderabad vs MumbaiHyderabad vs NoidaHyderabad vs PuneIndore vs KolkataIndore vs MumbaiIndore vs NoidaIndore vs PuneKolkata vs MumbaiKolkata vs NoidaKolkata vs PuneMumbai vs NoidaMumbai vs PuneNoida vs Pune
Both sides are counted the same way on the same day, so the gap is comparable even where the
absolute numbers move. Salary figures use only postings that publish a range — the disclosure
rate is in the table because a median over 20% of a cohort is a weaker number than one over 70%.